By Richard Johnson Âû, Proud Autistic Living
It’s nearly impossible to avoid hearing or reading the words high functioning autism/autistic. Regardless of their validity or inadequacy at actually describing anything, you will hear them in the autism world. You can hear them applied to people in both negative and positive ways. You can hear them used as a weapon to silence or as a shield of avoidance.
“But you’re so high functioning.”
“They must be high functioning.”
“But you’re much more high functioning than my child.”
“You don’t look autistic.”
And so the list could go on. I’ll stop there before I get myself too worked up in a combination of sadness and anger at the ignorance that is perpetuated by such statements. It may sound harsh but it is true these statements betray a lack of insight and understanding of autism and autistic people.
It is not, and to the best of my knowledge, has never been present in the diagnostic criteria contained in any version of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM). The current iteration of the DSM, which is DSM5, describes autism as “ASD – Autism Spectrum Disorder.” It breaks this down into three levels which describe the severity of traits, behaviours and support needed.
It is my understanding the term high functioning autism originated with Leo Kanner who used it to describe people diagnosed with autism who tested with a high IQ result. You may notice I said tested with a high IQ, not have a high IQ. The IQ test is a standardised test, however, it is highly enculturated and saturated in its bias for particular skills in areas of cognition.
The reality is nobody really knows what they mean but everyone has some preconceived concept of what it might mean. Because of this, there are assumptions made about autistic people based on that flawed label and what they can and can’t achieve in life. For some, the term high or low implies the ability to- or not-to-speak with mouth parts, as if speaking is an actual an indicator of a person’s ability to function in life.
All of these misconceptions and erroneous understandings do not allow for the fact that functioning fluctuates. I think this is true for all people but heightened for those who are neurodivergent.
Do a quick scan of a social media feed to see that that on some days (or some moments, some months, some weeks) people have times they can or can’t manage their daily responsibilities. For neurotypical people this can be the difference between the level of effort required to get through the day. It can be the same for neurodivergent people too, but also it can be much more profound, such as:
When a neurodivergent person says they can’t “people” today, it’s actually a thing. A thing that they really, really mean. A thing that could be the difference between total withdrawal and shutting down for extended periods of time.
The important thing to note is that the sensory and social environments have a massive impact on these fluctuations. These, of course, cannot be accurately predicted and accounted for. Of course, there are some aspects we can predict. We know when we navigate a shopping centre we might have some sensory issues. That’s all very well but there are so many aspects that you can’t account for, like that moment your vestibular and proprioceptive security is compromised when unexpectedly surrounded by the movement of large groups people.
Fluctuations in functioning come upon us slowly and quickly, with and without warning. They can build up gradually or they can come in like a bomb blast. They are real and serious. But please don’t call me high-functioning, please don’t call me low-functioning. Please don’t call me anything functioning.
I am autistic. Period. No further descriptors required.
The post Why the High-Low Labels are So Wrong! appeared first on Geek Club Books.